Well, I have recently been studying about my K9 origins. Humans claim they descend from monkeys, which doesn’t surprise me, as they still show many similarities with this amazing species.
However, which are our K9’s ancesters? This is what I found on a BBC website:
22 November, 2002, 05:03 GMT
Origin of dogs traced
Even puppies seem to have an innate understanding of humans
Dogs today come in all shapes and sizes, but scientists believe they evolved from just a handful of wolves tamed by humans living in or near China less than 15,000 years ago.
It looks as if 95% of current dogs come from just three original founding females
Matthew Binns, Animal Health Trust
Three research teams have attempted to solve some long-standing puzzles in the evolution and social history of dogs.
Their findings, reported in the journal Science, point to the existence of probably three founding females – the so-called “Eves” of the dog world.
They conclude that intensive breeding by humans over the last 500 years – not different genetic origins – is responsible for the dramatic differences in appearance among modern dogs.
One team studied Old World dogs to try to pin down their origins, previously thought to be in the Middle East.
The other team studied dogs of the New World and found they are not New World dogs at all, but also have their origins in East Asia.
Carles Vila, of Uppsala University, Sweden, one of the team studying the New World dogs, told BBC News Online: “We found that dogs originating in the Old World arrived to the New World with immigrating humans.
“Thus, even before the development of trade as we know it now, humans had to be exchanging dogs.”
A pet now but an integral part of the story of human development
He added that exactly how or why humans domesticated dogs was not known, but the speed at which they seem to have multiplied and diversified indicates they played an important role in human life.
“I can imagine that if dogs were, for example, improving the quality of hunting, that would be a very great advantage for humans. It could even have made the colonisation of the New World easier.
“There must have been something advantageous about those dogs that made them extremely successful and allowed them to spread all over the world.”
Peter Savolainen, of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, led the study of Old World dogs, analysing DNA samples taken from dogs in Asia, Europe, Africa and arctic America.
‘Bit of a surprise’
His team found that, though most dogs shared a common gene pool, genetic diversity was highest in East Asia, suggesting that dogs have been domesticated there the longest.
“Most earlier guesses have focused on the Middle East as the place of origin for dogs, based on the few known facts – a small amount of archaeological evidence from the region, and the fact that several other animals were domesticated there,” he says.
Genetic evidence shows chimps are our closest relatives
The researchers studied gene sequences from the dogs’ mitochondrial DNA, which is inherited directly from the mother. The findings indicated that the major present-day dog populations at some point had a common origin from a single gene pool.
Matthew Binns, head of genetics at the Animal Health Trust in Newmarket, UK, said the findings were significant.
He told BBC News Online: “For the first time, there’s relatively convincing evidence actually pinpointing the date at which the dog was domesticated and also the location of that domestication, which is a bit of a surprise.
“People have previously thought that a lot of species were domesticated in the Middle East and this data clearly shows domestication took place in East Asia.”
He added: “It looks as if 95% of current dogs come from just three original founding females and I guess these are the Eves of the dog world.”
In a separate study, researchers at Harvard University and the Wolf Hollow Wolf Sanctuary, both US, studied social cognition in dogs and were surprised by the findings.
In a simple experiment designed to compare their behaviour to those of wolves and our closest relative, the chimpanzee, the findings clearly showed that dogs – even young puppies – were far better at interpreting social cues from humans.
The food was hidden in little buckets
The dogs had to choose which bucket had food hidden underneath it, and the experiment was designed so they could not rely on their superb sense of smell. The scientists helped by pointing or looking in the direction of the hidden food.
Researcher Brian Hare said the dogs outperformed even the chimpanzees, and the puppies were as good as the older dogs, proving the skill was innate and not learned.
“During domestication there was some kind of change in their cognitive ability that allowed them to figure out what other individuals wanted using social cues. The biggest surprise was the puppies – even as young as nine weeks old, they’re better than an adult chimpanzee at finding food.”
He said the research might ultimately provide some clues as to how social skills evolved in humans.”